November 23, 2024

Martin Kobler Signs Memorandum of Understanding with Iraqi Government for Voluntary Relocation of Residents of Camp New Iraq

UNAMI Press Releases

Baghdad, 25 December 2011- The United Nations and the Government of Iraq signed today a memorandum of understanding (MoU) for a humanitarian and peaceful resolution of the situation of the residents of camp New Iraq (former Ashraf).

The MoU was signed on behalf of the United Nations by the Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General for Iraq, Mr. Martin Kobler, and on behalf of the Government of Iraq by the National Security Advisor to the Prime Minister of the Republic of Iraq, Mr. Faleh Fayad.

“The United Nations involvement in this issue has been from a purely humanitarian perspective. It has done its utmost as an impartial facilitator to find a peaceful and durable solution to the situation of the residents of the camp. The MoU respects the sovereignty of Iraq and its international humanitarian and human rights obligations and protects the security and rights of the camp’s residents”, SRSG Kobler said. “At the same time, the residents of camp New Iraq have to abide by the laws of Iraq”, he added

The MoU was developed through a series of joint meetings between the United Nations and Iraqi government representatives. UNAMI also consulted extensively with the residents of the camp.

In broad outline, the MoU establishes a process whereby the Government of Iraq will relocate the residents to a temporary transit location for a process of refugee status determination by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), a necessary first step for their resettlement outside Iraq. The United Nations will provide around the clock monitoring until the completion of the process. The UNHCR will immediately deploy a team at the new location to proceed with the verification and adjudication of the claims for refugee status it had received. The MoU includes a clear commitment from the Government of Iraq that it will ensure the safety and security of the residents at the new location. The Government also commits to the substantial involvement of its Ministry of Human Rights throughout the process, including the provision of a liaison officer.

“I want to make it very clear that this MoU is about voluntary relocation and its implementation is based firmly on all sides acting peacefully and in good faith. This will permit the UN to remain engaged in the process.” SRSG Kobler said.

“I would like to highlight that the Government is exclusively responsible for the safety and security of the residents both during their transfer and in the new location until they leave the country”, SRSG Kobler added.

“I also reiterate my call to Members States of the UN to accept the residents of the camp in their countries”, SRSG Kobler said.

SRSG Kobler expressed his gratitude to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights for its valuable and active support to the UN facilitation process as well as to the UNHCR for its full engagement and tireless efforts to help ensure a humanitarian, peaceful and durable solution for the camp’s residents.

http://www.uniraq.org/newsroom/getarticle.asp?ArticleID=1617

Terrorist Quds Force affiliated teams fire Katusha rockets at Camp Ashraf

NCRI – On Sunday evening, around 20:00 hours (Baghdad local time) terror teams affiliated with the Iranian regime’s terrorist Quds Force targeted Camp Ashraf with Katusha rockets that landed inside the southern section of the camp near where the housing units of the residents.

On Thursday, General Hossein Hamedani,  a commander of Iranian regime’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) acknowledged, in an interview with IRGC’s Fars news agency , that he had been personally to Camp Ashraf for reconnaissance activities and setting the stage for an attack against the camp.  

Since one week ago, some 400 agents of Iranian regime’s Ministry of Information and Security (MOIS) had been stationed in a building complex in northern part of Ashraf. The building had been occupied by the Iraqi forces during their attack on camp on April 8, 2011.

Therefore, the Iranian regime and its terrorist Quds Force are the ones that are in practice exercising their “sovereignty” over the camp area.
 
Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran
December 25, 2011

http://www.ncr-iran.org/en/ncri-statements/ashraf/11568-terrorist-quds-force-affiliated-teams-fire-katusha-rockets-at-camp-ashraf

Abandoning America’s Iraqi and Iranian allies

UNITE PRESS INTERNATIONAL

WASHINGTON, Dec. 23 (UPI) — As U.S. troops head home from Iraq, Americans welcome them with open arms and take pride in others who risked their lives to support the U.S. side — direct hires like translators left behind plus Iraqi and Iranian supporters.

U.S. diplomats actively manage a crisis in the Iraqi Parliament between Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki‘s supporters against former Prime Minister Ayad Allawi and Iraqiya, his multi-sectarian group of mainly Sunni and moderate Shiite Muslims. The crisis involves another major Sunni — Vice President Tariq al-Hashimi, who escaped to the Kurdish area because of an arrest warrant on apparently trumped-up charges he ran a death squad.

American envoys pay too little attention to Iraqi and Iranian facilitators of the wartime effort and needs them to counter al-Qaida of Iraq and Tehran’s efforts to destabilize Iraq.

Consider the contribution of Sunni tribal partners to a drop in violence during 2007-08. They added weight to the increase in American boots on the ground. Although the surge receives the credit for decreasing violence, an “awakening” among Arab tribes removed over 100,000 Sunnis — a political surge reinforcing the U.S. military surge.

U.S. Barack Obama, D-Ill., stated Oct. 22, 2008, in Time magazine that “The Sunni awakening changed the dynamic in Iraq fundamentally. It could not have occurred unless there were some contacts and intermediaries to peel off those who are tribal leaders, regional leaders (and) Sunni nationalists.”

My trip to Iraq in October 2008 validated Obama’s hunch: I met scores of Iraqi awakening tribesmen of Sheik Ahmed Abu Risha, a Sunni leader from Ramadi west of Baghdad. In exchange for reinforcing the American surge, they expected protection. But Washington is leaving such Sunni partners “in limbo.”

Other Iraqi friends who assisted the U.S. military are moderate Shiites from Iraq’s southern provinces. Sheik Walid told me he joined the fight against al-Qaida of Iraq after meeting with U.S. military forces in Camp Ashraf, home to Iranian dissidents in Iraq, the Mujahedin-e-Khalq.

Tearing a page from Obama’s playbook about interlocutors helping Iraqis join the American alignment against al-Qaida, Sheik Walid explained that his tribe had dozens of trilateral meetings with the U.S. military mediated by the MeK in Camp Ashraf.

While al-Qaida of Iraq has almost been decimated by U.S. Special Operations raids, there are indications of resurgence. Sunni tribes may be the best antidote to al-Qaida but might not be as trusting after being ditched by Washington and isolated by Baghdad.

Washington is also leaving its former Iranian partners in danger. While Sunnis and moderate Shiites are imperiled, Iraqis can blend into the culture, an option unavailable to Iranian dissidents. As opponents of Tehran, they are endangered outside the relatively safe confines of Camp Ashraf.

Even the camp is a risky place because Iraqi forces launched bloody assaults against these unarmed Iranian civilians in July 2009 and April 2011; Baghdad threatened to remove camp residents forcibly this month to put a coda on the U.S. withdrawal. Even though Iraq extended the timeline until mid-2012 for its move against the camp, its residents remain at risk.

The U.S. State Department’s plan, ostensibly to save the Iranian dissidents, trusts twice violated Iraqi assurances they would be treated humanely if they would leave the camp for a former U.S. base — Camp Liberty. The department wrongly blames MeK leaders in Paris of preventing Ashraf rank and file acceptance of this plan.

On the basis of my interviews with MeK leaders in Paris and European Parliament documents, I determined that since May 2011, the MeK leadership accepted an EU-brokered plan for Ashraf residents to be interviewed as individuals in a safe location for resettlement in third countries. They would accept any location the United Nations chooses, if it guarantees protection from and back to Ashraf, a position reiterated this week.

Eight years since the invasion and close of the U.S. military role, there is a need for a more assertive U.S. political role to create a “diplomatic umbrella” to shield moderate Iraqi parliamentarians, former U.S. direct hires but especially Washington’s Iranian allies.

The Iranian dissidents face the most serious dangers; consequently, Washington could put teeth in a demarche to Baghdad by privately conditioning a portion of economic assistance on whether Iraq consents to a U.N. team interviewing the Iranians at a secure location in a third country for resettlement outside of Iraq.

The American-supported Iraq relocation plan without protection for the residents of Ashraf is a toxic recipe for an avoidable humanitarian tragedy for which responsible American and Iraqi officials can be held accountable in international tribunals.

(Raymond Tanter, an adjunct professor in the Government Department of Georgetown University, served on the National Security Council senior staff in the Reagan administration and is author of “Terror Tagging of an Iranian Dissident Organization.”)

Read more: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/Analysis/Outside-View/2011/12/23/Outside-View-Abandoning-Americas-Iraqi-and-Iranian-allies/UPI-62651324642560/#ixzz1hPMid1hb

Amnesty International: Residents of ‘Camp Shraf’ in Iraq at risk

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL

Between 400 and 800 Iranian nationals living in a camp in Iraq could be transferred to a new location at the end of this year. Their security could be at risk while they are being moved. Amnesty International is calling on the Iraqi authorities to ensure the ir protection .

Camp New Iraq, formerly known as Camp Ashraf, situated 60 kilometres north of Baghdad, is home to some 3,250 Iranian asylum-seekers who have lived in Iraq for some 25 years. They are associated with the Iranian opposition group, the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI). The camp has been attacked several times by Iraqi security forces, most recently in April 2011, causing the deaths of dozens of residents and injuries to others.

On 15 December, the Iraqi authorities publicly confirmed their plans to close the camp on 31 December this year. In an interview with press agency Agence France Presse (AFP), Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki said that the decision to close the camp was “irreversible”. On 21 December, Nuri al-Maliki announced that he had agreed to extend the deadline for closing the camp until April 2012, but wanted the camp’s residents to have left Iraq by then. However between 400 and 800 residents could be temporarily moved to another camp, known as Camp Liberty, before the end of the year. Meanwhile the residents of Camp Ashraf have agreed that 400 residents can move to Camp Liberty, if certain safeguards are in place regarding their protection. PMOI representatives have announced they are ready to negotiate this with the Iraqi government as soon as possible as well as negotiating a peaceful solution for the rest of the residents.

The office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) had previously announced in a statement that it had received a high number of asylum requests from the camp residents and was putting in place a process to assess such requests on an individual basis. This process has not yet started.

READ MORE: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/MDE14/047/2011/en/ff519369-e233-4826-a550-567eeba8e008/mde140472011en.html

Three year siege of Ashraf, war crime and crime against humanity, not to be whitewashed

NCRI – The AFP on Wednesday December 21 quoted the United States’ State Department as follows:  “After tensions related to necessary supplies to the camp during recent months, it seems that no problem remains as to the supply of food and water but some ‘worrying’ remains on fuel supplies.” Those affirmations are completely erroneous and devoid of truth.  The Iraqi government, on strict demands from the Iranian regime, has imposed a harsh all round siege on Ashraf since three years ago, a siege strongly intensified during recent months.

  • Since the beginning of 2009 and especially during the last two years, repressive Iraqi forces have continuously hurdled the transfer of the urgently sick and the wounded to Baghdad hospitals or even those of Erbil or Baqouba, as well as blocking medical supplies to the camp.  Since April 17, 2011, no medicine has been permitted into the camp.  Twelve ill or wounded residents have died during last year because of this siege. Cases concerning those people have been referred to the United Nations and the US administration.
  • Since February 8, 2011, not a single drop of gasoline has entered the camp.  Since May 17, no diesel fuel needed for lights, heating or air conditioning units or even kitchens has been supplied to the camp.  Even the fuel needed to produce electricity has been stopped since last month, with agents of the terrorist Qods force breaking fuel pipes on December 13 to deprive the power center of the fuel. The gas reserve has thus been emptied and the power station is now out of production.  On November 2, repressive forces even prevented biomass and coal, to be used as alternate fuel, from entering the camp.
  • Repressive forces have even abstained from turning the corps of Mrs. Zahra Mehrsefat, resident of Ashraf who died on September 20 because of medical shortages, to her family.
  • Psychological torture of residents which has been going on since nearly two years, continues through 300 loudspeakers on a permanent basis.   Family members, lawyers, members of parliaments and Human rights’ activists have been barred from visiting the camp since three years.  Working by the residents to gain part of their expenses has been prohibited.

By any standard, the above mentioned points as well as a long list of shortages and pressures imposed on the camp are considered an inhuman and criminal siege.  The United Nations and the United States of America have been informed of every single violation described above.
 
The Iranian Resistance regrets the unjust and unrealistic attitude of the US State Department and calls for an international fact finding delegation to be formed in order that a true report on the dimensions of this criminal siege be produced for public awareness and for international courts.   By any standards, such a siege is considered a clear example of crime against humanity and war crime with nobody being able to whitewash it.

Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran
December 22, 2011

http://www.ncr-iran.org/en/ncri-statements/ashraf/11558-three-year-siege-of-ashraf-war-crime-and-crime-against-humanity-not-to-be-whitewashed

Mrs. Rajavi welcomes peaceful solution for Camp Ashraf,announces the residents’ consent for relocating 400 to Camp Liberty with provision of minimum guarantees for their security and safety

Mrs. Rajavi declares her readiness to travel to Baghdad for talks with the Government of Iraq at the presence of UN Secretary General’s Representative to Iraq, US Secretary of State’s Special Advisor on Ashraf, Special Advisor to Baroness Ashton on Ashraf, Vice-president of the European Parliament, President of the Delegation for Relations with Iraq at the European Parliament and the lawyers of Ashraf.

NCRI – Mrs. Maryam Rajavi, the President-elect of the Iranian Resistance, welcomed the peaceful resolution of the Ashraf crisis and repeated her readiness to visit Baghdad immediately to engage in discussions with the Iraqi government on arrangements to implement the plan for the peaceful resolution of Ashraf crisis and to ensure the minimum guarantees for the safe and security of 400 Ashraf residents as they relocate to Camp Liberty.

The talks should be held in presence of Ambassador Dan Fried, Special Adviser to the U.S. Secretary of State on Ashraf; Martin Kobler, the UNSG Representative to Iraq; Ambassador Jean de Ruyt, Special Adviser to Baroness Ashton on Ashraf; Dr. Alejo Vidal-Quadras, Vice-president of the European Parliament; Struan Stevenson, President of European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations with Iraq; and lawyers of Ashraf.

Mrs. Rajavi noted that she had already made this proposal to the Government of Iraq through the United Nations and U.S. officials, but had not yet received any response. Pressuring the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK) and the Iranian Resistance to accept inhumane conditions that are demands of the Iranian regime, are unacceptable, she emphasized, especially when fraught with distortions, misrepresentations and falsifications.

Commenting on Wednesday’s remarks by Prime Minister Maliki, Mrs. Rajavi said:  “If Mr. Maliki, as he says, truly seeks the departure of PMOI from Iraq, he should have not wasted any time in the past four months and should have immediately had accepted that the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees start its work in Ashraf to reaffirm the residents’ refugee status in order to resettle them in third countries.”

“Mr. Maliki claims that the PMOI has invaded an Iraqi city named Ashraf. However he conveniently forgets to acknowledge that the residents had turned this previously arid and barren piece of  land into a city during the past 25 years of  hard work  and enormous costs, and that they had certain rights.”

“More importantly,” Mrs. Rajavi said,  “Mr. Maliki deliberately remained silent about attacks on Ashraf in the past three years, including massacres of July 2009 and April 2011, in which 47 residents were killed and 1071 were wounded.  Neither did he mention that 12 residents had died due to lack of access to proper  medical services.  Instead, he referred to the terrorist designation of the PMOI by the U.S. and the clerical regime. Ironically, today the European Court of Justice categorically rejected any claim that the PMOI was terrorist.”

“It seems,  in his own words, the only red line for Mr. Maliki is refraining from ‘inflicting any harm,’ and upsetting the clerical regime.”

Mrs. Rajavi added: “Human rights principles and international law make forcible relocation illegal and the UN Secretary General, Deputy Secretary General, the UN High Commission for Refugees, the International Committee of Red Cross, UN Assistance Mission in Iraq and majorities in more than 30 parliaments have reiterated this fact.” Nevertheless, underscoring that that the GOI had not accepted the protection of Ashraf residents at Camp Liberty by the U.S., the Blue Helmets, EU forces or even private U.S. security companies,  Mrs. Rajavi said that upon the requests of the UN and the U.S., she had asked the residents of Ashraf  to accept in principle to relocate to Camp Liberty, with the minimum guarantees for their security and well-being and improvement in their conditions; the minimum humanitarian and legal guarantees that have not yet received positive response from the GOI.”

The President-elect of the Iranian Resistance, stated that the following are the minimum humanitarian and legal guarantees:

1. Safe and secure transfer of  each and every one of Ashraf residents, without exception, to Camp Liberty with their vehicles and moveable property under international observation;
2. 24/7 monitoring by the UN and the U.S. until the resettlement of the last person to the third countries;
3. Initiation of UNHCR work;
4. Iraqi forces shall be stationed outside of  fenced area of the new location to ensure security and tranquility, particularly for nearly 1,000 Muslim women;
5. Ending the siege against, and halting any persecution and harassment of, the residents and the annulment of forged warrants of arrests without exception; and
6. Selling of the fixed properties of the residents under UN supervision and reimbursing it to the residents to pay for their security, logistical expenses and transfer to third countries.

Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran
December 21, 2011

http://www.ncr-iran.org/en/ncri-statements/ashraf/11555-mrs-rajavi-welcomes-peaceful-solution-for-camp-ashraf-announces-the-residents-consent-for-transfer-of-400-of-them-to-camp-liberty

Iraq extends deadline for Iranian exiles to exit Camp Ashraf

ASSOCIATED PRESS

BAGHDAD (AP) – Under international pressure, the Iraqi government on Wednesday backed off its threat to close a refugee camp holding 3,400 Iranian exiles by the end of the month.

Instead, Iraq said it will shut Camp Ashraf sometime in January and insisted that all its residents must leave the country by April. It promised not to deport anyone to Iran.

A spokeswoman for the exiles responded positively to elements of the plan and insisted that the U.S. and U.N. guarantee their safety. The extension of the deadline raises the likelihood of a peaceful resolution to the standoff, heading off a possible bloodbath that many international observers have feared.

The future of Camp Ashraf, home to exiles dedicated to the overthrow of the Iranian regime, has been a sticking point for Iraq’s Shiite-led government, which counts Iran as an ally.

The armed People’s Mujahedeen Organization of Iran first moved to the camp during the regime of Saddam Hussein, who saw the group as a convenient ally against Tehran. U.S. soldiers disarmed them during the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has been determined to close down the camp, located in barren terrain northeast of Baghdad about 50 miles from the Iranian border. His government considers the camp, which the exiles vigorously defend with a sophisticated public relations operation in the West, as an affront to Iraq’s sovereignty.

“We don’t want to hand them over to Iran. We don’t want to kill them. We don’t want to oppress them and we don’t want to starve them. But their presence in Iraq is illegal and illegitimate,” al-Maliki said during a press conference Wednesday, three days after the last U.S. soldiers left the country.

The Iraqi government had vowed to shut the camp completely by the end of December and move the residents to another location. That raised concerns that forcibly removing them would result in violence, and the United Nations has been trying to broker a deal.

The U.N. has said that at least 34 people were killed in a raid on the camp by Iraqi security forces last April.

On Wednesday, Iraqi spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh said the government had worked out a plan to move up to 800 of the residents to a new facility in Baghdad by the end of December. That facility is a former American military base called Camp Liberty.

Al-Dabbagh said the rest of the residents would be relocated as soon as possible in January. Once they have all moved, Camp Ashraf would be closed. He said all the camp’s residents would then be relocated outside of Iraq by no later than April.

In a statement Wednesday, the head of the People’s Mujahedeen Organization of Iran, Maryam Rajavi, welcomed a peaceful solution for Camp Ashraf. She said she has asked the Ashraf residents to relocate to Camp Liberty provided certain conditions are observed including U.S. and U.N. monitoring.

Al-Dabbagh said the plan calls for camp residents who are citizens of non-Iranian countries to move there eventually. But most of the residents have only Iranian citizenship, so homes in other countries would have to be found for them as well. He said no one will be forcibly sent back to Iran and that they would be treated well at Camp Liberty.

A U.S. State Department spokeswoman, Victoria Nuland, said Wednesday that the process of moving the residents to a new location and eventually resettling them would take time.

“We’re gratified to see that the Iraqi government is going to give it a little bit more time and that they’re particularly cooperating well with the U.N. process,” she said.

For all the discussion over Camp Ashraf, little is known about the inside of the camp or its residents’ day-to-day lives. The Iraqi government generally does not allow journalists to visit.

The road to Camp Ashraf is heavily guarded with signs warning people against taking photographs. The Iraqi Army keeps people from getting too close, and all that’s visible of the camp are towers from which troops monitor the inhabitants.

The residents complain that they don’t get proper medical treatment or enough fuel in the winter. And they accuse the Iraqi government of harassing them through hundreds of loudspeakers stationed around the camp, blaring insults and threats around the clock.

Iraqi guards outside Camp Ashraf say it’s the residents, not the security officials, who hurl insults with loudspeakers. They also contend that the residents regularly attack the soldiers with stones. The guards say the residents have regular access to medical care, and that the only items withheld are possible poisons and explosives.

The guards did not want to be identified because they were not authorized to speak to the media.

The U.S. State Department has said it does not know of any limits on food or water but that there were concerns over making sure the residents had enough fuel.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/story/2011-12-21/camp-ashraf-iran-iraq-exiles/52146682/1

EU court upholds bar on Iran group terrorism listing

REUTERS

BRUSSELS – The EU’s highest court upheld a decision Wednesday to remove an Iranian opposition group from the EU’s terrorism blacklist, a ruling that could affect the fate of thousands of the organization’s members stranded in Iraq.

France had appealed against a decision by a lower EU court that ordered the European bloc to remove the People’s Mujahideen Organization of Iran (PMOI) from its terrorism list, but the European Court of Justice rejected the appeal.

It upheld a 2008 decision by the ECJ’s court of first instance, which held that the EU had failed to provide the PMOI with evidence that formed the basis of a decision to keep it on the terrorism list.

“The adoption of such a decision must, in principle, be preceded by notification of the incriminating evidence and by allowing the person or entity concerned an opportunity of being heard,” it said.

French officials said they regretted the court’s ruling and pointed out that some of Paris’ closest allies continue to list the PMOI as a terrorist organization.

The PMOI, which strongly opposes Iran’s clerical rulers, waged a violent insurgency against the Shah in the 1970s and staged attacks on U.S. interests, but now says it has renounced violence and supports secularism and democracy.

Despite lobbying on the group’s behalf, the United States still lists it as a terrorist organization.

The EU dropped its terrorist designation in 2009 after the 2008 court case. EU officials said the decision was based on the legal case and not a result of concluding that it was no longer a terrorist group.

The group’s status is an important issue right now, as it could have an impact on 3,000 activists stranded at a camp in Iraq, where they were once guests of former leader Saddam Hussein and later received protection from U.S. troops.

The government of Iraq, which is friendly with Tehran, says it will close Camp Ashraf by the end of this year, leaving just days to resolve their fate.

Washington has tried to persuade the activists to accept a U.N. plan to move to a new camp near Baghdad airport. From there, they could eventually be resettled abroad, which is easier to organize if countries do not list them as terrorists.

Camp residents say they fear for their safety now that U.S. troops have withdrawn from Iraq, ending their nine-year presence.

In a statement, PMOI leader Maryam Rajavi welcomed the court’s decision and called on the United States to take the PMOI off its terrorism list, saying the residents of Camp Ashraf had suffered the consequences of the listing.

Tuesday, Rajavi said the PMOI would agree to the U.N. plan provided the United Nations, the United States and European Union supported and endorsed the proposal and the Iraqi government guaranteed the residents’ security and well-being.

(Reporting by David Brunnstrom; Editing by Andrew Heavens)

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/21/us-eu-iran-france-idUSTRE7BK26N20111221

Top EU court upholds removal of Iran’s PMOI from terror list

DEUTSCHE PRESSE AGENTUR

Luxembourg – The European Union’s top judges on Wednesday endorsed a lower-court ruling that called for the People’s Mujahedin of Iran (PMOI) to be removed from the bloc’s list of terrorist organizations.

Founded in 1965, the PMOI operated a military wing in its early years, but says it renounced violence in June 2001 and now advocates the political overthrow of Iran’s current government.

France had appealed the lower-court decision, after managing in 2008 to convince its EU counterparts to keep the PMOI’s assets frozen, even after it was taken off a British list of terrorist organizations.

But the European Court of Justice agreed with the EU’s General Court that the bloc had violated the PMOI’s right to defend itself by not notifying it of new investigation information brought forward by French authorities.

It was ‘bound, imperatively, to ensure that PMOI’s rights of the defence were observed,’ the Luxembourg institution noted.

‘The court emphasizes that the protection offered by this notification is fundamental and essential to the rights of defence,’ it added.

Iran regards PMOI as a terrorist group and accuses it of involvement in the assassinations of several high-ranking Iranian officials, including the president and prime minister in the 1980s.

http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/middleeast/news/article_1682116.php/Top-EU-court-upholds-removal-of-Iran-s-PMOI-from-terror-list

Mrs. Rajavi calls on President Obama and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to ensure the minimum guarantees for the relocation of Camp Ashraf residents to Camp Liberty

NCRI – The Iranian Resistance’s President-elect, Mrs. Maryam Rajavi, while announcing that the residents of Ashraf were in principle prepared to relocate to Camp Liberty, appealed to President Obama and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon for their intervention and assistance so that the United States, the United Nations and the European Union support and endorse, and the Government of Iraq accept, the minimum guarantees for the residents’ security and well-being, in order to prevent the recurrence of violence and bloodshed until the residents are resettled in third countries.

Recalling that UNHCR has recognized the residents of Ashraf as “formally asylum-seekers under international law,” and that “international law requires that they must be able to benefit from basic protection of their security and well-being,” Mrs. Rajavi said that since the GOI has not accepted the protection of Ashraf residents at Camp Liberty by the U.S., the Blue Helmets, EU forces or even private U.S. security companies, the “minimums”, which draw the red line between forced and unlawful relocation and peaceful and voluntary solution and relocation, include the following:

– Permanent and independent U.S. and U.N. monitoring at Camp Liberty as a refugee camp with the UN flag and guaranteeing the safety of each and every one of the residents without exception from Camp Ashraf to Camp Liberty and from Camp Liberty to third countries;
 
– Ending the siege against, and halting any persecution and harassment of, the residents and their access to medical services and the right to visitation by their families and lawyers inside Camp Liberty;

– Iraqi forces shall not be present inside the Camp’s fenced area to ensure the security and tranquility, particularly for nearly 1,000 Muslim women, and to not interfere with the residents’ daily life; and

– Transfer of Ashraf residents to Camp Liberty with their vehicles and moveable property under UN, U.S. and EU monitoring and the selling of their fixed properties to be reimbursed to the residents to pay for their expenses.

Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran
December 20, 2011