November 23, 2024

Lawmakers fear Iranian dissidents face assault in Iraq

THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Want U.N. to protect Camp Ashraf

Demonstrators hold petitions asking President Obama to protect Iranians at Camp Ashraf in Iraq during a rally at the White House on Saturday. (Associated Press)

Nearly three dozen U.S. lawmakers are urging U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to prevent a fresh outbreak of violence at a camp for former Iranian resistance fighters in Iraq.

In a letter made public Wednesday, they wrote that residents of Camp Ashraf have been subjected to “deadly incursions and repeated incidents of harassment” by Iraqi forces.

Late Monday night, Iraqi troops and police entered the camp with sirens blaring in what residents said was an attempt to intimidate them.

On April 8, the Iraqi army attacked the camp, killing 36 residents, including eight women. More than 300 others were wounded. The lawmakers warned of “another tragedy on a larger scale” without prompt U.N. action.

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has set a Dec. 31 deadline to close Camp Ashraf. The U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees has said that the Iraqi deadline does not leave enough time to process the refugee status requests of Camp Ashrafs 3,400 residents, who fear they will be arrested and executed if they are deported to Iran.

The Obama administration has expressed its concern to the Iraqi government about the recent developments at Camp Ashraf.

“We are … in a continuing dialogue with the government of Iraq, at the very highest levels, to impress upon them the importance of treating the residents of Ashraf humanely,” State Department spokesman Noel Clay said Wednesday.

Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said she is worried about the Iraqi militarys actions inside Camp Ashraf.

“The residents are being subjected to psychological torture,” the Florida Republican said.

Mrs. Ros-Lehtinen said a strong message must be conveyed by President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and U.S. generals in Iraq to the Maliki government that it must uphold commitments to protect the camp’s residents.

“Iraq feels like it can do whatever it wants whenever it wants to the Camp Ashraf residents, and no one will protest,” Mrs. Ros-Lehtinen said.

Rep. Judy Chu, California Democrat, told a gathering on Capitol Hill that the Iraqi government must extend its deadline to shut the compound.

“We are in a critical time period,” she said.

Meanwhile, the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Wednesday adopted a resolution to put additional sanctions on Iran. The resolution includes an amendment committing the United States to ensuring the protection of Camp Ashraf residents.

The residents of Camp Ashraf are members of the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran, an Iranian opposition group that the State Department designated as a foreign terrorist organization in 1997. The residents and their supporters say the Iraqi government has used this designation to justify its actions against the camp.

U.S. forces disarmed the Mojahedin in 2003 and turned over control of Camp Ashraf to the Iraqi government in 2009.

In their letter to Mr. Ban, the lawmakers said the United Nations must set up a “full-time monitoring team” inside the camp.

“This will create the safe, accountable and orderly environment where all claims can be fully processed and all refugees can be resettled in third countries where they are safe,” they wrote.

The continued presence of the resistance on the State Department’s terrorism list is the main reason for the harassment of Camp Ashraf residents, according to some scholars.

“If [they] were not on the terrorism list, Maliki would not be able to justify treating the residents of Camp Ashraf as terrorists,” said Raymond Tanter of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

Britain and the European Union took Iranian resistance off their lists of terrorist organizations in 2008 and 2009, respectively.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/nov/2/lawmakers-fear-iranian-dissidents-face-assault-in-/

House committee OKs new penalties against Iran

ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON (AP) — A House panel on Wednesday unanimously approved harsher penalties against Iran, arguing that an economically weak Tehran will struggle in its pursuit of nuclear weapons.

By voice vote, Republicans and Democrats on the House Foreign Affairs Committee pushed forward two bills that would strengthen current sanctions while expanding the list of companies and individuals subject to penalties. Lawmakers cited recent allegations of an Iranian plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to the United States and insisted that such brazen behavior demands consequences.

The legislation builds on sanctions that Congress overwhelmingly passed — and President Barack Obama signed — last year. Those penalties targeted exports of gasoline and other refined petroleum products to Iran and banned U.S. banks from doing business with foreign banks providing services to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard. The United Nations and the European Union have also imposed sanctions on Iran.

The latest legislation “is designed to clamp new and tougher sanctions on Iran’s energy sector, threatening the regime’s existence if it refuses to halt its nuclear weapons program,” said Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., the committee chairwoman. She called Iran’s energy sector the country’s Achilles heel.

The United States has tried repeatedly to coax Iran into international negotiations with the U.S., Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany over its nuclear program. Iran contends that its program is designed to generate electricity, not build weapons.

Among the new provisions, the House bills would restrict foreign subsidiaries of U.S. companies from doing business with Iran, include bartering among activities that could be sanctioned and prohibits Americans from conducting commercial or financial transactions with the Revolutionary Guard.

Directing its ire at Syria and North Korea as well, one provision would strengthen the prohibition on granting landing rights in the United States to vessels that have visited Iran, North Korea or Syria in the last two years.

Rep. William Keating, D-Mass., said the government of Syria, widely criticized for its crackdown on demonstrators, receives political and material assistance from Iran.

The committee, by voice vote, adopted an amendment by the panel’s top Democrat, Rep. Howard Berman of California, that would require the president to determine within 30 days whether Iran’s central bank is supporting the country’s chemical, biological or nuclear weapons or missile programs, financing the purchase of advanced convention weapons, underwriting the Revolutionary Guard or aiding Iran’s support for international terrorism.

If the president makes such a determination, the administration would be required to impose penalties that would bar any foreign bank doing significant business with the central bank from U.S. economic activities.

“Our hope, as with all our sanctions, is that an economically challenged Iran will have less money to spend on weapons of mass destruction, terrorism and other nefarious activities,” Berman said.

The sanctions appear to be taking a toll in Tehran. Just this week, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad acknowledged that the current penalties were impeding Iran’s financial institutions, saying, “our banks cannot make international transactions anymore.”

The committee also approved an amendment by Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, designed to protect the several thousand Iranians living in exile at Camp Ashraf, located northeast of Baghdad, Iraq. The camp is run by the People’s Mujahedeen Organization of Iran, a resistance group to Tehran’s clerical regime that has been a harsh critic of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

It has been attacked by the Iraqi army, with dozens killed, and Baghdad is intent on closing the camp.

The provision in the bill calls on the administration to pressure Iraq to ensure the well-being of the camp residents. The measure also calls for preventing the involuntary return of camp residents to Iran and delaying the camp closure until the U.N. High Commission for Refugees can resettle the residents in another country.

“If history is any guide, it will see another massacre,” Poe warned.

Ros-Lehtinen expressed hope that the House leadership could move quickly on the legislation, which has 343 co-sponsors.

She said she wanted the bills ready for the president’s signature “to hand the Iranian regime a nice holiday present.”

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jj2bqkbYDkP7bGYkuAZMOBBPmd2g?docId=3dcc27d13f3c464aaa297c647a20afb4

US lawmakers advance new Iran sanctions

AGENCE FRANCE PRESSE

WASHINGTON — The US House Foreign Affairs Committee approved legislation Wednesday to toughen sanctions on Tehran over its suspect nuclear program in the wake of an alleged Iranian assassination plot.

The panel endorsed the measure by voice vote, with Democrats and Republicans closing ranks in the wake of US allegations that Iranian officials schemed to hire Mexican drug cartel killers to murder Saudi Arabia’s envoy to Washington.

“There should be consequences to this type of behavior, and I believe the international community must stand up against this threat,” said the committee’s top Democrat, Representative Howard Berman.

US lawmakers aim to tighten already considerable sanctions on the Islamic republic, notably on its energy and banking sectors, in a bid to force a freeze to what the West argues is a covert nuclear weapons program.

The measure calls for new sanctions such as denying US visas to anyone involved in Iran’s oil or gas industries, toughening existing measures against weapons of mass destruction and an amendment authored by Berman aimed at cutting Iran’s central bank off from global financial markets.

Republican Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, the committee’s chairwoman, called on the full House and Senate to approve the legislation quickly to get it to President Barack Obama’s desk “in time to hand the Iranian regime a nice holiday present.”

Lawmakers amended their text to add measures targeting Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, blamed in the plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador, and financial entities they control. The text also singled out individuals or foreign entities aiding the elite corps.

The panel also urged the Obama administration to press Iraq to postpone the closure of a camp housing thousands of outlawed Iranians until the United Nations grant political refugee status to those who want to avoid returning to Iran and place them in third countries.

Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said Monday that his government was resolved to close down Camp Ashraf, northeast of the Iraqi capital, by year’s end.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iaydBEVMghh-JdWFuN5T3ylYgm1A?docId=CNG.277271d0aa542d00f612f1524cd48fa9.151

One Thousand Women on the Verge of a Massacre in Camp Ashraf

THE WOMEN’S INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE

More than 5 months have passed since Iraqi forces last carried out a brutal attack against a refugee camp in Iraq housing 3,400 Iranian dissidents – 1,000 of which are women. That attack left 36 people dead, including 8 women, and 375 other men and women were left injured. The residents of this camp are Iranian exiles, members of the resistance movement struggling against the theocratic dictatorship ruling Iran.

A female resident of Camp Ashraf is killed by the Iraqi forces' direct fire during the April 8, 2011 massacre at Camp Ashraf.

For the past 2 years they have been living under siege. Iraqi forces, stationed in and around the camp, have exposed the residents to all sorts of restrictions and psychological pressures. At behest of the mullahs in Tehran, the Iraqi Prime Minister has announced he is going to shut down the camp by year’s end; which could only mean that another massacre is in the making.

Based on requests submitted by the residents – for reconfirmation of their status – UNHCR has announced that under international law, Camp Ashraf residents are protected persons; urging the Iraqi Prime Minister postpone his deadline, giving the legal process a chance to take its due course which might lead to a long-standing resolution of the crisis. The Iranian regime and the Iraqi PM, however, are hurling stones in the way of this process and have begun preparations for an upcoming assault.

Is the world going to stand idly by and watch another massacre perpetrated against defenseless residents in Camp Ashraf who have no means of protecting themselves?

Mrs. Maryam Rajavi leads the Iranian resistance. While attending an international conference in Brussels last Wednesday October 19 she reproached EU governments and the U.S. for their negligence in addressing the deadline set by the Iraqi government for closure of Camp Ashraf which may very well lead to another massacre. She warned that should Iraq’s disobedience and its evasion of international laws – in its effort to obliterate camp Ashraf residents – not be contained today, tomorrow would be too late. She also revealed that based on information obtained by the Iranian resistance, the government of Iraq, having received orders from the Iranian supreme leader, Khamenei, using the ultimatum for closure of Camp Ashraf as a pretext, is making preparations for another attack. As such, the Iraqi government hinders efforts by UN organs aimed at finding a solution for Camp Ashraf; including pressure exerted on UNHCR and its efforts in affording the residents legal status.

For nearly 2 years, the 300 loudspeakers, erected by notorious Qods force and the Iranian intelligence agency around the camp, have been used to blare insults and threats at the residents – specially targeting female residents – around the clock and every day of the week. The Qods force is the same organization implicated, recently, by the U.S. Department of Justice for its role in the plot to kill the Saudi ambassador as well as Americans.

The negligence and indifference exhibited by western governments towards an atrocity that looms ahead of us cannot be overlooked. The extensive political, military, and economic ties which exist between Iraq and western governments, gives them great leverage which could be used in obliging Iraq into respecting international laws. The time has come for the UN secretary general and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to expedite efforts for stationing a UN monitoring team in Camp Ashraf to help save the lives of 3,400 Iranian immigrants. They must call for annulment of the unjust ultimatum set with the sole aim of obliterating opponents of the main state sponsor of terrorism in the world.

The policy of appeasing the mullahs and turning a blind eye on terrorist activities by the Qods in Iraq, resulting in the death of many American soldiers, has only emboldened the terrorists to extend their operations to Washington D.C. It’s high time President Obama listen to calls from across the globe and warnings from Camp Ashraf’s defenseless residents. If not, what is bound to happen in Camp Ashraf will never be forgiven.

Asefeh Immami was only 6 months old when, due to her parents’ opposition to the mullahs and because her father was on the death row, she had to leave Iran, along with her family, and come to Camp Ashraf – now home to 3,400 Iranian dissidents in Iraq.

http://thewip.net/talk/2011/11/one_thousand_women_on_the_verg.html

Iranian exiles in Iraq fear attack from Iraqi soldiers

 THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Unarmed Iranian exiles in an Iraqi refugee compound fear another “bloodbath” by Iraqi soldiers after military vehicles rolled into the area late Monday, an Iranian source inside the compound told The Washington Times on Tuesday.

Iraqi army battalions and Iraqi police are preparing to attack Camp Ashraf,” said Shahriar Kia, a spokesman for the Iranian resistance exiles in the compound.

They are “setting the stage for a bloodbath,” he said as he released a video recording of about 40 army and police vehicles driving into the compound with sirens blaring at about 11 p.m. Monday.

The authenticity of the video could not be confirmed independently.

Iraqi soldiers periodically have attacked the Iranians at Camp Ashraf over the past few years, most recently killing more than 30 refugees and injuring about 320 during a raid on the compound in April.

Ali Safavi, president of Near East Policy Research in Washington, said the latest threat to Camp Ashraf will be the subject of a congressional briefing Wednesday, when 40 House members will release a letter to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon calling for his help in preventing more violence at the site.

“The situation at Camp Ashraf is growing more dire by the day,” Mr. Safavi said.

About 3,400 Iranian exiles live in Camp Ashraf, which has housed the People’s Mujahedeen of Iran, the former military wing of the Iranian resistance, since the 1980s. U.S. forces disarmed the Iranian rebels in 2003 after overthrowing Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.

Two years ago, the United States turned over control of the camp to the Iraqi government, which has announced plans to close the compound and relocate its residents by Dec. 31.

The exiles fear Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki will deport them to Iran, where they would face execution.

Mr. Maliki has called the mujahedeen a “terrorist organization,” relying on a 1997 State Department designation of the rebels as a terrorist group.

Mujahedeen rebels were accused of killing several Americans in Iran in the 1970s but have not threatened U.S. interests since then.

Mr. Maliki’s critics have accused him of attacking the compound to gain favor with Iran’s regime, which is believed to be increasing its influence over Iraq.

A U.S. federal court last year ordered the State Department to review its listing of the mujahedeen as a terrorist group. The European Union removed the group from its own terrorist list in 2009.

The Iranian resistance has been gaining support from several high-profile former officials who served under President George W. Bush, including former Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey and former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge.

Howard Dean, an ex-chairman of the Democratic National Committee, also supports the resistance.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/nov/1/iranian-exiles-in-iraq-fear-attack-from-iraqi-sold/

Amnesty International urges the Iraqi government to extend deadline for Camp New Iraq residents

Amnesty International is concerned that some 3,250 Iranian long term residents of Iraq who reside at Camp New Iraq, 60 kilometres north of Baghdad, are at serious risk of severe human rights violations if the Iraqi government goes ahead with its plans to force the closure of the camp by the end of December 2011.

The Camp, formerly known as Camp Ashraf, has previously been attacked several times by Iraqi security forces causing the deaths of dozens of residents and injuries to others. Most recently, Iraqi troops stormed into the camp on 8 April using grossly excessive force and live fire against residents who tried to resist them. Some 36 residents, including eight women, were killed and more than 300 others were wounded. At least nine camp residents were killed and others injured in an earlier attack by Iraqi security forces on 28-29 July 2009. Some 36 camp residents who were detained were held for more than two months and reportedly tortured before being released on 7 October 2009.

Camp Ashraf, as it then was, was formerly under the protection of the United States Force-Iraq (USF-I) until June 2009, when it was transferred to the control of the Iraqi government. Since then, the camp and its residents have been virtually besieged by Iraqi troops as the government intensifies pressure on the residents, many of whom belong to the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI), to leave Iraq. The PMOI is an Iranian opposition organization that formerly engaged in armed attacks on Iran before deciding several years ago to cease espousing violence. Supporters of the PMOI were allowed to reside as exiles in Iraq by the former Iraqi President Saddam Hussain, overthrown in 2003.

The Iraqi government has repeatedly stated its opposition to the continued existence of the camp. While on a visit to Iran last June, Iraq’s President Jalal Talabani announced that Camp Ashraf would be closed by the end of this year and the Iraqi government subsequently confirmed this to the United Nations Secretary-General in early October.

Meanwhile, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees – UNHCR, (the UN Refugee Agency), has reported receiving a large number of individual asylum requests from camp residents and has called on the Iraqi government “to consider extending the deadline for the closure of the Camp” and to provide “necessary facilities” to allow asylum interviews to be held in a “safe, neutral and confidential location” rather than at the camp.”

By 31 October, however, negotiations were still continuing between UNHCR, the United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI) and the Iraqi government to identify a location at which to conduct such asylum interviews. Camp residents, for their part, contend that these interviews should be held at or close to the camp because they fear that their security and safety otherwise might not be guaranteed and that they would be at risk of arrest by Iraqi security forces and forcible return to Iran, where many of them would be at serious risk of gross human rights violations.

Amnesty International is also urging the Iraqi government to allow adequate time for the asylum applications of Camp New Iraq residents to be properly scrutinised by UNHCR in order to make its determinations relating to the refugee status of camp residents confidentially, on neutral ground and in a timely and safe manner. Throughout this process the safety and security of the camp residents must be of paramount importance. If the interviews are held outside Camp New Iraq the residents’ safety and security, including their travel back to the camp, must be guaranteed.

Amnesty International urges the Iraqi government to fully respect the human rights of the residents of Camp New Iraq and to end all harassment of the residents by its security forces surrounding the Camp.

Amnesty International also calls on the international community, in particular European and North American countries, to come forward and agree to resettle the residents of Camp New Iraq who have been accepted as refugees in a timely manner.

Background

Notwithstanding the fact that the camp residents have been living in Iraq for 25 years, the Iraqi government has made clear its wish that they leave the country. In 2009 the government told the residents that they should leave Iraq by 15 December 2009 or else face forcible relocation within Iraq, but did not enforce this due apparently to international pressure, including from USA and the UN.

Since the April 2011 assault, however, the Iraqi authorities have tightened controls on the camp residents to the extent that some of those injured and other residents suffering from chronic ailments were prevented or obstructed from leaving the camp to obtain more specialised medical treatment than that available there. As well, the security forces have also reportedly sought to impede the flow of phone and other communications between the camp residents and the outside world and have installed loudspeakers, prompting fears among residents that the Iraqi security forces are preparing to carry out a further violent incursion into the camp.

In the face of international pressure, following the April 2011 assault on the camp, the Iraqi government said it had set up a committee to investigate the attack and the killings; however, as in other cases where such investigations have been announced, no outcome has been reported and it remains unclear whether any serious investigation was ever conducted.

UNHCR, Camp New Iraq (formerly Camp Ashraf) residents and the determination of their refugee status claim, 13 September 2011. (http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/home/opendocPDFViewer.html?docid=4e7064e26&query=camp%20ashraf )

http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/MDE14/042/2011/en/8f6d56f5-73d5-4b77-8814-7d7fe4625ec2/mde140422011en.html

 

Iraqi army battalions and police forces are preparing to attack Camp Ashraf

NATIONAL COUNCIL OF RESISTANCE – PRESS RELEASE

Click here to watch the video

October 31, 2011, 11 pm local times: Iraqi Army battalions and police forces are preparing to attack Camp Ashraf .

NCRI – At 11 pm last night, a column of Iraqi military vehicles, including at least 30 military vehicles with one column of police vehicles including 10 cars, entered from the main gate of Camp Ashraf with a lot of noise and lights on, patrolling and conducting exercises around the camp began. The suppressive battalion commander and his deputy were also in this column

Simultaneously, the mercenaries, who for the past 21 months have been engaged in psychological torture of the residents with 300 loudspeakers, increased their threats, shouts and slurs. The intention for this suppressive exercise was on one hand preparing to attack Ashraf and on the other, to launch a psychological warfare and intimidation among the residents. These actions were carried out following yesterday’s trip of Salehi, the foreign minister of religious fascism ruling Iran to Baghdad and delivering Khamenei’s instructions to his puppet government in Baghdad to defy international demands for revoking the deadline for closure of Ashraf by year end.

Iraqi Foreign Minister, Hoshyar Zebari at a joint press conference in a disgusting appeasement promised Salehi that Iraqi government would close Camp Ashraf by the end of the year.  At the same time, last night the police chief of Diyala and Diyala operations commander went to Ashraf to oversee this exercise and also to be abreast of the necessary preparations for the November 1st show.

As mentioned in NCRI’s statement 156, the mullahs’ regime embassy in Baghdad with the help of the Committee for suppression of Ashraf in the Prime Minister’s office, is supposed to bring a number of Iraqi mercenaries for sit-in in front of Ashraf in order to pretend that local residents are demanding the closure of Camp Ashraf.

The Iranian Resistance warns that the clerical regime and the Government of Iraq are setting the stage for a bloodbath in Ashraf and calls on the U.S., EU, the U.N. and other international parties to prevent a new bloodbath in Ashraf. It calls for implementation of the directive of the U.N. Secretary General underscored in his July 7 report to the UN Security Council. The UN Secretary General reiterated: “I encourage all stakeholders involved to increase their efforts to explore options and seek a consensual solution,” and “I call upon Member States to help to support and facilitate the implementation of any arrangement that is acceptable to the Government of Iraq and the camp residents.”

Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran
November 01, 2011

http://www.ncr-iran.org/en/ncri-statements/ashraf/11398-army-battalions-and-iraqi-police-are-preparing-to-attack-ashraf

Remarks by Iraqi Foreign Minister, stage-setting for a greater massacre in Ashraf

National Council of Resistance of Iran – Press Release

Mohammad Mohaddessin, Chairman of the NCRI Foreign Affairs Committee

NCRI – Yesterday, 31 October 2011, foreign minister of Iraq Mr. Hoshyar Zebari, in a joint press conference with the foreign minister of the fascist clerical regime ruling Iran Salehi, in a repulsive kowtow promised him: “We have declared that the decision to close down Ashraf by the end of the year shall be implemented. In letters to the United Nations Secretary-General, the High Commissioner for Refugees, and the European Union, we have emphasized the government’s decision in this regard… There is no government that would accept the presence of a group or an organization on its soil against its will, its laws, and its sovereignty… this is not an acceptable matter in the international laws or conventions… we have even requested from our brothers in the Islamic Republic to adopt a clear and unequivocal stance regarding the issuance of amnesty or to offer specific facilities to those members of the organization that would voluntarily desire to return to their families in the Islamic Republic or to third countries in for their resettlement.”

Mr. Mohammad Mohaddessin, Chairman of the NCRI Foreign Affairs Committee, stated in this regard:

1- The repressive deadline to close down Ashraf by the end of 2011 is a flagrant violation of many articles and principles of the international law, the international human rights law, and the international humanitarian law. This ultimatum is a dictate of the religious fascism ruling Iran. This ultimatum lacks any justification and vividly demonstrates the ominous intents of the Iraqi government to massacre Ashraf residents at the behest of the Iranian regime, especially after Ashraf residents, despite their absolute right to remain in a place they have lawfully lived for 26 years, have accepted the European parliament plan for resettlement in third countries.
2- The UN High Commissioner for Refugees, together with many other UN agencies  and many international parties have called on the Iraqi government to revoke this deadline thereby making possible the reconfirmation of the status of residents as political refugees and opening the way for a peaceful resolution of Ashraf issue and the transfer of residents to third countries.
3- Mr. Zebari’s statements are a blatant violation of UN Secretary-General’s instruction in article 66 of his report to the Security Council on July 7. Expressing his concern for “the loss of life during the violent incident on 7 and 8 April”, the Secretary-General wrote, “I urge the Iraqi authorities to refrain from the use of force, and to ensure adequate access for camp residents to goods and services”. He added, “I therefore encourage all stakeholders involved to increase their efforts to explore options and seek a consensual solution” and “I call upon Member States to help to support and facilitate the implementation of any arrangement that is acceptable to the Government of Iraq and the camp residents”.

4- Contrary to the statement made by Maliki’s foreign minister, Ashraf residents reside in Iraq in the context of the international law; they have never violated Iraq’s sovereignty, they have not occupied Iraqi land, and their presence in Iraq is in accordance with the international law. During the recent years, more than twenty legal opinions by the most significant international jurists have emphasized Ashraf residents’ rights as protected persons under the Fourth Geneva Convention and political refugees. There is an international consensus that forcible relocation of Ashraf residents inside Iraq is illegal, forbidden and considered as a crime against humanity.

5- Zebari’s remarks set the stage for a yet greater massacre and justify the last two massacres against Ashraf residents on April 8, 2011 and July 28-29, 2009. The National Court of Spain has already opened a file against al-Maliki for crime against international community, crime against humanity and war crime.

6- We remind the foreign minister of Iraq that as the main minister in Maliki’s government, he is responsible for all the crimes committed by this government including massacre of Ashraf residents, and hence, he is liable to prosecution and trial in international tribunals. His statements concerning closure of Ashraf, which prepares the ground for a more massive crime, make him even more involved in these crimes. Zebari should not forget that the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal held all Hitler’s top ranking officials responsible for his crimes.

7-The members and supporters of Iranian Resistance including residents of Ashraf have only one red line which is giving in to the religious fascism ruling Iran. The clerical regime suffering total internal isolation, vainly attempts to eradicate the Ashraf residents to rescue its faltering regime. Through the overthrow of this regime and establishment of democracy in their homeland, the Ashraf resident, like other members of the Resistance, will soon go back to Iran. Mr. Zebari should think about the legal consequences of his partnership in Maliki’s crimes.

8- Mr. Zebari’s shameless remarks, doubles the responsibility of international community in this issue. The Iranian Resistance warns the UN Secretary-General, High Commissioner for refugees, High Commissioner for Human Rights, European Union and its high representative Baroness Ashton, Ambassador Jean De Ruyt and the United States against a further massacre in Ashraf. The Iranian Resistance calls on these authorities to take a clear and explicit stance against the deadline and compulsory relocation of Ashraf residents inside Iraq. It also calls for imperative measures by the UN to undertake protection responsibility of Ashraf residents and to station permanent international monitoring team in Ashraf.      

Foreign Affairs Committee
National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI)
November 1, 2011

Senior Former U.S. Officials Urge Obama Administration To Uphold America’s Commitment and Protect Residents of Camp Ashraf in Iraq

PRNewswire

WASHINGTON, Oct. 31, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — In a panel on Friday, October 28, 2011, entitled “U.S., U.N. Obligations to Avert Impending Humanitarian Catastrophe at Camp Ashraf,” former senior U.S. national security, military and judiciary officials urged the Obama administration to honor its written commitment to the residents of Camp Ashraf and protect them from another onslaught by the Iraqi government, according to Iranian-American Community of Northern California.

Camp Ashraf is home to 3,400 members of the Iran’s main opposition, Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK). Only eight weeks are left to the arbitrary deadline set by Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to shut down Camp Ashraf and forcibly relocate the residents to their death.

The speakers urged the United States to raise the issue of Camp Ashraf at the United Nations Security Council to facilitate the stationing of the UN blue helmet forces in Camp Ashraf to protect the residents from Iraqi attacks before they are relocated to third countries.  

“In 2003, we saw no evidence that the MEK should be listed as a terrorist organization. Therefore, we negotiated their disarmament and provided for their protection not as terrorists but as a military organization. My expectation at the time was that delisting would occur and the occupants of Camp Ashraf would gain the refugee status that they deserved,” said General William S. Wallace, former Commander of U.S. V Corps.

Recalling former President Bill Clinton’s regret about his inaction to avert the 1994 genocide in Rwanda, former State Department Policy Planning Director Mitchell Reiss, said, “President Clinton’s wife is now the Secretary of State and has the power to remedy the injustice at Camp Ashraf… All she has to do is delist the MEK and ensure that the residents are given safe passage out of Iraq.”

“Unless immediate action is taken, another tragedy on a much larger scale than we witnessed back in April [8th massacre at Camp Ashraf] is looming… Remember that we have a very narrow window, 65 days and counting, to accomplish these actions or there will be blood on our hands, and the world will see that America did not honor its commitment, that America did not honor its promise, and our leadership will bear the responsibility for the horrible outcome because we lacked the moral and the political courage to stand for what was right,” said General Hugh Shelton, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Ambassador Dell Dailey, former State Department’s Coordinator for Counter-Terrorism noted that “If the MEK were delisted, it would be much easier for the residents of Camp Ashraf to move from Iraq to a third country… For the sake of peace in the region, safety and the livelihood of the residents of Ashraf, and the lives of thousands of innocent people, she [Secretary Clinton] must delist the MEK now.”

Displaying the “Protected Person” ID card issued by the United States for an Ashraf resident who was killed during the July 2009 massacre, Eugene Sullivan, former Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, said, “Don’t let this identification card which gave de facto protection become a license to kill… Madam Secretary of State, delist the MEK now. Madam Secretary, keep our nation’s word. Let it be our bond.”

Admiral James Lyons, former Commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, while asking why the MEK has not been delisted added that the U.S. Congress “should enact and President Obama should sign into law Iran’s Liberation Act, thereby making regime change in Iran the official policy of the United States Government.”

John Sano, CIA’s first Deputy Director for Clandestine Services, told the panel that “if the Secretary of State can offer to the Libyan regime that we’ll help take care of your wounded fighters, what is she doing for the people who were massacred in April [in Camp Ashraf] and the likelihood that this will reoccur by the end of the year?”

 SOURCE Iranian-American Community of Northern California

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/senior-former-us-officials-urge-obama-administration-to-uphold-americas-commitment-and-protect-residents-of-camp-ashraf-in-iraq-132963403.html

MEPs warn of ‘humanitarian catastrophe’ at Iran exile camp

AGENCE FRANCE PRESSE

BRUSSELS, Oct 31, 2011 (AFP) – European parliamentarians issued a fresh warning Monday of a looming “humanitarian catastrophe” at an Iraqi camp housing Iranian exiles and urged the United Nations to provide protection for its 3,400 residents.

MEP Struan Stevenson, who heads the parliament’s delegation for relations with Iraq, said in an e-mail that 180 parliamentarians from the main political groups had signed a petition urging the postponement of a December 31 deadline set by Baghdad to close the camp.

“We have only eight weeks left to make (Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri) al-Maliki see sense or I fear we will face a certain humanitarian catastrophe,” he said.

The plea came as in Baghdad, Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said his government was resolved to close down Camp Ashraf, northeast of the Iraqi capital, by year’s end.

“The decision will be implemented by the end of this year,” he said, speaking alongside his Iranian counterpart Ali Akbar Salehi.

“There is no government that would agree to an organisation staying against its (authorities’) will, laws and sovereignty.”

Hundreds of protesters gathered in Washington and Brussels earlier this month to demand that the camp’s closure be postponed to protect the 3,400 Iranian dissidents who have lived there for 30 years.

The camp, which has become a mounting international problem, has been in the spotlight since an April raid by Iraqi security forces left 34 people dead and scores injured, triggering sharp condemnation.

It was set up when Iraq and Iran were at war in the 1980s by the People’s Mujahedeen Organisation of Iran (PMOI), later coming under US control until January 2009, when US forces transferred security for the camp to Iraq.

The PMOI has been on the US government terrorist list since 1997 but has received support from leading US figures in its battle to obtain international supervision of Camp Ashraf’s closure, which comes as US forces pull out of Iraq.

In their petition, the MEPs said the closure “could be used as a pretext for a large-scale massacre.”

The petition accused Iraqi forces of psychological warfare on residents, threatening them day and night over 300 loudspeakers and restricting access to fuel and medicines. It said at least 12 people had died in recent months due to an “inhuman medical blockade.”

Because the UN High Commissioner for Refugees needed more time to interview the residents to decide on their future, the MEPs said they were calling on the United States and the United Nations to force Iraq to postpone the December 31 deadline “until the transfer of all residents to third countries has been accomplished.”

They also asked for UN monitors at Ashraf “to assure and guarantee the residents’ protection until they are transferred to alternative host countries.” 

Read more: http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2011/Oct-31/152694-meps-warn-of-humanitarian-catastrophe-at-iran-exile-camp.ashx